The Kenya Union of Post Primary Education Teachers (KUPPET) has taken a firm stance against the Teacher Service Commission (TSC), demanding the refund of housing levy deductions from teachers’ January salaries. While KUPPET Secretary General Akelo Misori vocalizes the union’s discontent, the Kenya National Union of Teachers (KNUT) remains conspicuously silent on the matter. Misori asserts that the deductions, deemed illegal and unconstitutional by the High Court and Court of Appeal, reflect TSC’s willingness to disobey the law.
Quick Summary
- KUPPET demands the refund of housing levy deductions from teachers’ January salaries, following a court ruling declaring the levy illegal and unconstitutional.
- Secretary General Akelo Misori criticizes TSC for not recalling the payroll despite the court order, highlighting the commission’s disregard for the law.
- Misori emphasizes the union’s commitment to protecting teachers’ earnings and benefits, including contemplating contempt proceedings against TSC.
KUPPET’s Assertive Stance
KUPPET Secretary General Akelo Misori, addressing the media, criticizes TSC for not recalling the payroll despite clear court orders declaring the housing levy illegal. Misori expresses disappointment in the commission’s actions, emphasizing that the court ruling provided ample time for necessary adjustments to the payroll. He reveals that payslips from teachers across the country indicate housing levy deductions, despite the court orders.
Immediate Refund and Future Assurance
KUPPET demands the immediate release of the housing levy deductions and seeks assurance from TSC regarding compliance with court orders in the future. Misori underscores the union’s commitment to taking all measures to protect teachers’ earnings and benefits, including contemplating contempt proceedings against TSC in their personal capacity. He urges the government to intervene and safeguard teachers’ financial well-being.
KNUT’s Silence
While KUPPET takes a vocal stance against the housing levy deductions, there is notable silence from the Kenya National Union of Teachers (KNUT) on the matter. The absence of a statement or position from KNUT raises questions about the union’s stance and approach to the issue.
Final Thoughts
KUPPET’s demand for the refund of housing levy deductions and their commitment to protecting teachers’ rights highlight the contentious relationship between teacher unions and the authorities. The silence from KNUT adds an element of intrigue, leaving room for speculation about the union’s position on the matter. As the unions navigate this dispute with the TSC, the broader implications for teachers’ rights and the dynamics between unions and educational authorities in Kenya remain in the spotlight.